MO3354 Rethinking the World in East Asia

Tutor: Konrad M. Lawson

Fall, 2024

MO3354 Rethinking the World in East Asia 1850s-1990s

Overview

  1. Introduction to Buddhism
    Introduction to Buddhism and to some schools in China and Japan that are most relevant to discussion in later weeks
  2. Introduction to Confucianism
    Introduction to some of the basic Confucian classics and its monumental impact on East Asian history
  3. Taiping and Tonghak
    On the universalist aspirations of the Taiping Rebellion (Qing), Tonghak Rebellion (Chosŏn)
  4. Revolutionary Internationalism
    Focusing on the political imaginations of key East Asian anarchists
  5. New Orders for Love, Family, and the Individual
    Reordering domestic space and women’s liberation as the first step to comprehensive social and global change at the global level
  6. Independent Learning Week
  7. Buddhist World Orders
    Nichiren, Zen, Shin and new Buddhist movements in 20th century East Asia
  8. Cosmopolitanism from the East
    Chinese world redemptive movements, Esperantists, and some utopian visionaries
  9. New Directions in Japanese Thought and Overcoming Modernity
    The universal and the particular in Japan’s most influential philosophical school
  10. Confucian Renewals
    The development of new Confucianism in a variety of forms focusing on China and Korea
  11. Imagining Alternate Futures
    Utopian visions of Kita Ikki and Kagawa Toyohiko; alternative futures in Japanese and Chinese science fiction

Key Details

Lecturer: Konrad M. Lawson Email: kml8@st-andrews.ac.uk
Meets: Fall, 2024 - Thu 11:00-13:00
Location: St. Katharine’s Lodge 0.01
Office: St. Katharine’s Lodge B3
Office Hours (Online): Thu 13:00-14:00. Sign up for a time here

Description

This intellectual history of late modern East Asia explores the ways social, political and religious movements, as well as the evolving ideas of key individuals in Korea, Japan, and China hoped to transform or reimagine the social and political order of their times Literary and visual sources as well as philosophical or religious texts, debates, and the political tracts of various movements will be at the core of the module and offer opportunities to explore the multiplicity of inspirations and dynamic nature of the intellectual history of the region that challenges some common depictions of the relationship between tradition and modernity, as well as assumptions about the simplistic adaptation of Western ideologies in East Asian history.

Assessment Summary

Summative (100% coursework)

Formative (Required to pass the module, but no grade given)

Learning Outcomes

Assignments

The summative assessed portion of the coursework for this module consists of one long essay, a long essay prospectus, one ten minute presentation, and four reading analysis posts. There are several formative assessments. These include a formative presentation (optional), a draft prospectus (optional), essay outline, and five elective reading handouts.

Note: Paper submissions are not requested for any of the assessments. You may upload the submissions directly onto MMS. Formative assessments are often shared on Teams for everyone.

Headers and Formatting

At the top of all your written work or on a cover page, you are required to include the following:

When formatting your assignments, you are required to follow these guidelines:

Other aspects of formatting are highlighted in the School of History style sheet. See the following section.

Footnotes and Bibliography

Long essays must use footnotes and a bibliography. Reading analysis posts can use simple parenthetical citation with no bibliogrpahy. Please carefully read the St Andrews School of History Style Sheet:

School of History Style Sheet

This document, sections 1-4, contains extremely valuable information on how to compose your essay, including how to format your footnotes and bibliography. In particular, please follow the instructions for footnotes carefully. Note: reading analysis posts do not need a bibliography (see below).

In your bibliography, please have separate sections for your secondary sources and the primary sources you used.

If you prefer and do so consistently, you may use the Chicago Style (Notes and Bibliography) over the St Andrews note formatting. I encourage you to manage your sources in a referencing tool such as Zotero to help manage your sources.

Ten Minute Presentation

15% Presentation Recorded with Slides or In-person with Handout

Being able to synthesise reading and present ideas orally in class is a key skill and you will have opportunities to improve this skill during the semester in four ways: 1) You will be formally assessed on one presentation. 2) If you are presenting in Week 3-11, you may submit a recorded formative presentation to get some early feedback on your presentation skills in an office hour meeting. 3) In addition, in any given week, if asked, you should be prepared to speak to the class for 2-3 minutes about the elective reading you have signed up for that week. You should be able to introduce the reading to other students who may not have read the reading, and articulate its main contributions to the week’s themes in a concise manner. If you are uncomfortable with being called on in this way about elective readings, please get in touch so we can discuss other options. 4) You will often be asked to discuss readings and questions in groups.

Sign-ups for in-person presentations are in Week 1 and are limited in numbers. Other presentations are recorded. In-person presentations require a handout but should not have slides. Recorded presentations have slides, but no handout. Slides or handout should be submitted to MMS by the day before your presentation as well as shared on Teams for everyone. Recorded presentations must be uploaded to the team at least 48 hour before our class begins so everyone has a chance to watch it. See the content session below for information about what to present on.

Recorded Presentation

The recorded presentation has slides but no handout. Record your voice over slides in Apple Keynote, in Powerpoint, or some other application, but this must export the result as a movie file for sharing with your teammates - you may not submit a powerpoint or keynote file and it should be a standalone video file that you share with the class via Teams (you can upload the simple slides or exported PDF of slides to MMS). You must submit the video at least 48 hours before the class related to the content, or you will receive a late penalty for each day as if it were an essay submitted late. A strong first class recorded presentation will not have very text heavy slides, will have an excellent connection between visual, textual, content and linking of slide content and spoken word, and will be delivered in a dynamic manner.

In-Person Presentation

We will have a limited number of slots during the semester for in-person presentations, first come, first serve via sign-up list on week 1. You are expected to produce a supplementary handout (single side of a single page) and answer one or two questions directed at you after your presentation. A strong first class live dissertation will not be read from an exact transcript, nor will it reproduce exactly content from any handout bullet points: it will be well-practiced.

Presentation Content

Unless you secure permission for a special topic from me, the topic of your presentation should be a single author monograph (not an edited volume of different chapters) from among those approved for the given week of your presentation. Throughout the seminar readings provided below you will see a (P) next to appropriate texts you may present on (don’t forget to check the further reading for options). If the work is in the required or elective reading section, however, your presentation should cover the entirety of the work, not merely any assigned chapters.

Because you are presenting on the work as a whole the presentation assessment, it is impossible to cover everything. You can tell us what aspects of the book you will focus on and which ones you will say little or nothing about based on their importance overall. You must have read to book as a whole, however, to know what is important or not important to present. This presentation will evaluate your demonstration of your ability to:

The assessed presentation should be 10 minutes in length and not a minute longer. Being slightly under the time limit is fine. The presentation should summarise the main arguments, point out what was most interesting or useful as a takeaway from the chosen text, and include at least some consideration of your critical evaluation: discuss at least one limitation or shortcoming. This should be substantive, based on an evaluation of concrete content, not superficial or based on your own enjoyement of the text (avoid “it was too long”, “it was boring”, “it was too theoretical”, etc.). It should not a detailed and exhaustive retelling of the content: it should set the context, highlight the arguments, strengths, contributions, and offer an evaluation. Nor is your goal to determine whether or not you can “recommend” that someone should read a book. Part (but not all) of the presentation may offer greater detail on a particularly important section.

What Ifs

If you have signed up for an in person presentation and you are sick or otherwise unable to attend your presentation, contact Konrad. Make-up presentations will be in the form of a recorded presentation. If you submit a recorded presentation late (that is, later than 48 hours before class to both MMS and Teams), you will receive the standard -1 per day it is late until it is submitted.

Some questions I consider when marking the presentations:

Formative Presentation

Presentations can be a stressful assessment for some students and practice helps. Any student who has signed up for a presentation from Week 3-11 may submit a recording of a 3 minute presentation focused on one of our required or elective readings (just an article or a chapter is fine from within the assigned material of any kind) and book an office hour to get feedback on this presentation and suggestions for their assessed presentation. Keep in mind you will need to share this on the team in the folder labeled as such at least a full day before office hours to leave time for your tutor to watch it and be able to give feedback.

Reading Analysis Blog Posts

We have a module blog at:

http://transnationalhistory.net/world/

20% At least four posts posted online in four weeks and then Final MMS Upload of four Chosen Posts Friday, Week 11, 5pm

This is a public facing website where students will contribute postings, but no students will be asked to use their real name. The posts there should be for an external audience who is interested in learning more about the topic and not be written from the perspective of a student in a class. It should include footnotes for reference to a source, but should not include a bibliography. You can set or change your pseudonym through the blog interface whenever you like. Students are required to post a minimum of four postings during the semester and these postings must be posted across at least four different weeks.

Again, your blog entries must be written, uploaded, and publicly visible on dates from four different weeks (Monday to Sunday semester weeks). You cannot write the posts and then upload them all at once as the deadline nears. You cannot post entries and set their date to an earlier point in the semester. Any submitted blog entry which comes from the same Monday to Sunday week as another post will receive a 4 point penalty.

You will receive a mark for these only after final submission of all posts, but you are welcome to come to office hours to ask for oral feedback on your first or second post. I strongly urge you to get most or all of these out of the way quickly, ideally by Week 6 or Week 7 so you can focus your energies on essay research and writing.

Blog Posts - What to Write:

Note: Many, perhaps most, of you will only write four posts during the semester. However, you are free to write more posts for the blog but you may only submit four of them in Week 11 on MMS. You may make minor editorial changes (corrections to language etc.) on the MMS submitted version, but may not make them longer. You may make them shorter by cutting material, if you like.

How to Post Blog Entries: You will be given details for your login information late in the first week. Then to login, go to:

http://transnationalhistory.net/world/post/

Elective Reading Handouts

Five Handouts Shared on Teams Channel by Evening Before Relevant Class

During the semester, you are required to submit at least three elective reading handouts. You may submit no more than one handout per week but you may choose the weeks. I strongly encourage you to get this done early in the semester. These are not marked, but submission of three of them is required to pass the module. Each week on Teams, by the evening before class at 11pm, you can upload a reading handout as a pdf odt, rtf, docx, or txt file to the “Files” for the channel of the week. The handout should be two pages and provide general info about the elective reading you chose. At the top, write 2-4 sentences which summarizes the text/s in your own words (you may not use generative AI for this!), including any main argument of the work/s. On the rest of the two page should include information you think is most important on the structure of the text/s, timeline, main sources used, key historiography engaged with, people or description of events discussed, and your own main takeaway points. You may make use of bullet points, lists, outlines, etc. Please name your handout strictly following this format: the week number, your first name, “Handout”, the category of elective reading and category title. For example: “W5 - Henrik Handout - C [name of elective reading category]”

Prospectus and Indicative Bibliography

15% abstract, overview, and bibliography of a minimum of 12 secondary sources for your long essay due Friday Week 7 5pm

15% of your mark for the module comes from a 500 word prospectus, a proposal or abstract for your long essay, including a draft articulation of a possible argument and an indicative bibliography (the latter not included in word count). You are also strongly encouraged to come to office hours to discuss a draft of this you will have an opportunity to submit earlier.

Prospectus (500 Words): Write a brief summary of your essay as if you have already written it. What did it do (in the past tense)? What kinds of sources did you use? How did you structure the essay? Include in this 500 words a sentence in bold which is a statement of the essay’s proposed argument. At this early stage of your research, this is highly speculative, and it is very unlikely to end up being the actual argument you will make in your essay. Your eventual final argument will also likely be much more concrete than it is here in the prospectus but use this as an opportunity to practice stating a possible argument you will make.

Indicative Bibliography: Divided into two sections, primary and secondary sources, offer a list of sources that you will have access to in a language you can read that you think will be useful for your essay based on your reading so far. For each source, include one complete sentence explaining why you think the source is useful. List no fewer than 12 secondary sources and no more than 30 (for this exercise). Sources should not merely be limited to those directly on the topic, but “climb up the ladder of abstraction” to include important works on the more general topic you can learn from.

If you shared a draft prospectus earlier, include a copy of the first draft prospectus after your submission (obviously, this doesn’t count against your word count). You will be primarily be evaluated on whether your argument clear, your scope realistic, your structure logical, and if you included an earlier draft, how you have developed your ideas in response to your first prospectus (if you have changed topics, which is not at all uncommon, you should still work on improving the quality of the proposal). You will be only secondarily marked on the overall historical merit of your proposal, whether the sources appropriate for the task, and whether the structure and scope indicated by your prospectus are well crafted.

Draft Prospectus

You will have an opportunity (optional) to share a draft of your prospectus on Teams for our Week 4 meeting. We will meet in groups to get peer feedback and you may get oral feedback from me in office hours. I may also offer some suggestions in replies to the posts on Teams or in class.

Long Essay

The 4,000 word essay (including footnotes) for the course is worth 50% of the total coursework. It may be up to 5,000 words without penalty (as opposed to the penalty starting at 10% limit over 4,400). Penalties for longer essays are then are as normal. 5,001 words receives a -1 penalty, and 5,401 a -2 penalty, 5,801 a -3 penalty and so on.

This is not an essay you research and compose in the final weeks of the semester. This essay requires you to make progress on it throughout the semester. Again: You must set aside several hours every week to work on this essay. Narrow down an area of interest, read within this area of interest, isolate a few themes of interest, carry out further reading and analysis, and then proceed to write an essay which makes a convincing historical argument.

Some class time in most weeks will be dedicated to discussing the essay. It is not uncommon for a student to change topics once or twice during the semester, as the feasibility of one topic or another is evaluated and the sources explored. I don’t recommend bigger topic changes after Week 7. My suggestion is that you answer two questions for yourself very early in your research: 1) Once you have a general topic or area of history you are interested in, think about what kinds of arguments or historical approaches have been applied to this area before that will serve as the starting point for your intervention? 2) What kinds of primary sources do you have realistic access to for use in the essay. Most first class essays will show an ability to carry out original research that includes use and analysis of primary sources, but students may choose to do a historiographical essay instead. It is harder, but by no means impossible, to meet the first class grade descriptors for a historiographical essay.

Topics for the Essay

Your essay should be an argument driven analytic research essay. You may write your essay on any topic related to the intellectual history of East Asia or Southeast Asia (not limited to the time period we primarily focus on). This may include history of religion, history of philosophy, and the history of social and political thought. Check with me first, but I will also be generally open to approving topics on almost any element of the cultural history of the region as well.

Journals for Inspiration: I would suggest browing some of the following journals, and especially note articles that fit the above description:

The Journal of Asian Studies
Monumenta Nipponica
Asian Philosophy
Philosophy East and West
Positions: East Asia Cultures Critique
Japanese Journal of Religious Studies
Journal of Japanese Studies
The Journal of Korean Studies
Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies
Journal of Modern Chinese History
Korean Studies
Korea Journal
Japanese Studies
Far Eastern Survey
Dao
Monumenta Serica
Late Imperial China
Modern China
Modern Asian Studies
Asian Studies Review
Critical Asian Studies
The China Quarterly
Journal of the History of Ideas
History and Theory
Global Intellectual History

Making an Argument

The academic study of history embraces change in the past as a way to explore solutions to particular problems. The object of an analytical historical research essay is not to tell us simply what happened, but to use what happened in order to make a historical argument about some problem clearly defined. For example, if an essay was written (to take an example from Chinese history) about some aspect of the religious aspects of the Boxer Rebellion, it should not consider its task complete when the major facts of the Boxer Rebellion and its religious elements have been retold. That is closer to the genre of the encyclopaedia entry than of academic historical study. It should endeavour to use the Boxer Rebellion as an opportunity to make an argument about something: what does the rebellion reveal about the nature of Western imperialism? The rise of new religious movements in China? The weakness of the late Qing state? The rise of Japan? The answer takes the form of a claim that does more than merely repeat a synthesis of what previous scholarship has established and agrees to be the case. The possibilities are many, but in every case, they offer an answer to the question: So what? History can and should tell stories, but a research essay embeds a story within an arc of an argument - if it contains narrative elements, it must also always include an analytic element.

The historical argument in your long essays, in particular, should be clearly and unambiguously stated in the span of 1-3 sentences somewhere in the opening third of the essay, preferably in the opening paragraph or two. It should not be obvious, trivial, or a well-known and rarely contested fact. Challenging as false an existing historian’s argument that has become considered obvious and rarely contested, however, is one ambitious way to find your way to an interesting and original argument but only if your evidence is sufficient. Alternatively, if you have found evidence that supports the existing arguments of historians in a given area of research in a new set of sources, from a fresh perspective, or in greater depth, or in a comparative light, that also often yields a strong argument. If you have identified a debate in the historiography and wish to take a position on it without simply repeating all of the points made by one of the participants of the debate, that can also yield an essay with a strong argument but you should take care to acknowledge the position and evidence of the other side.

Presenting your Argument: There are a number of different ways to write a strong essay and present the argument, but in this module, I would like to strongly encourage you to “front-load” your argument and do so clearly, that is, to present clearly early in the essay what it is you will argue and why it is important. For example, avoid sentences such as “I will explain…” or “I aim to understand…” or “I will explore…” unless such sentences are immediately followed by the explanation, what you ended up understanding, or what the result of your exploration was. Otherwise, there is a danger that your essay will merely provide a summary of some quantity of information you have found, rather than present the results of your analysis of that research in a useful way. In other words, do not use the introduction to make predictions about what you will do, but tell the reader in very clear terms what you have argued and shown in the essay. There are many ways to do this in more or less subtle language but there is no harm in a very clear, “In this essay, I will argue that…” followed by the rest of your argument, a short overview of what kinds of evidence you will use, how your argument fits into a historiographical context (how your argument relates to what other historians have to say about the matter), and why you think it is important.

Sticking to your Argument: All of us come across many interesting stories, anecdotes, and sub-points that we want to share in writing our essays. However, it is important to stay sharply focused on the main argument you are going to make in the essay. After you have finished writing your essay, read it through and for each paragraph and sentence ask yourself if it supported your argument, provided essential background to establishing your argument, or else if it does not offer much of a contribution. If it doesn’t, cut it ruthlessly from your essay to make room for better material.

Engaging with the historiography: What does this phrase mean? It means directly and explicitly acknowledging what historians have said about your topic and your specific question in existing work. Point out both positive contributions and problematic ones when appropriate. Who has worked on this before, and what specifically have they argued? See your essay as part of a larger conversation (it doesn’t necessarily have to be an adversarial one) that includes previous historians. Once you have considered those who have done research very close to your case or argument, also engage with the important historiography in the broader field most relevant to your topic.

Some other questions to ask yourself as you write the long essay:

Carrying Out Research for Essays

Secondary to Primary: When you have selected a question or broader topic for your longer essay the first, one common approach is to look for information on the topic among the various books and articles that are assigned or proposed in this course, especially the further reading of each week. This is the “secondary to primary” approach. Early on, it is useful to focus on skimming through sources as you find them, noting carefully works of potential interest found in the footnotes or bibliographies of these works to help you broaden and then later focus in your research. “Scrape” the bibliography and footnotes of more general works in your area of interest, look those works up and then “scrape” the bibliography/footnotes of those works (move between recent books/articles and older ones to try to fill out your search better). Eventually you will get a broader shape of the landscape of research around your topic. Along the way you will get the feel for what the key works are, but also what more general works “up the ladder of abstraction” are often cited that influence the writers or help them establish basic categories and concepts. You hopefully also get an impression for what kinds of primary sources have been used in the past, or at least categories of sources that may be useful. Then dive into the primary sources, either those which you have found through the secondary scholarship, or which may have been neglected by it but which has potentially something to contribute.

Primary then Secondary: Other students and scholars argue that you should avoid reading closely related secondary research on a topic in the first stage (beyond very general background), but instead directly dive into a set of relevant primary sources. Reading these, they look for things that stand out or which surprise or shock them, then they return to the secondary scholarship. If your initial ideas and reading end up not working out and you need to pivot during the semester, this is often a great way to do it: instead of starting the process above from scratch, find a rich body of primary sources and dive deep with them. Even with time lost on one idea, some of the best essays I have read have emerged from a student who has read deeply on some initial topic, started over, and this time tried things the other way around, starting with a single collection of interesting historical primary sources.

Whichever of these general approaches you take, in reality all students and scholars will need to move back and forth multiple times between primary and secondary sources as they refine their research questions and their proposed arguments.

When you do not find enough through the above method of beginning your trail with our existing assigned works and module handbook bibliography, proceed to search in various databases for relevant keywords:

The long essays should use at least a dozen secondary sources which are not websites and the inclusion of several primary sources (their number depends very much on what you are doing with them) is strongly encouraged. An essay based on sources that are the results of a simple google search can be written in an evening of frantic last minute work, but rarely demonstrates much effort, research skill, or ability to isolate high-quality materials to support an argument. This is not because there are not excellent websites with overviews on a topic, excellent wikipedia entries, etc. but because there is still usually far greater quality material found in published articles and books on most historical topics, including those which are assigned above. It is wise to make use of online research skills to get oriented in a new topic, but use this course as an opportunity to explore the wealth of academic research on your topics. Your essays will be assessed, in part, on how effectively your sources demonstrate your research efforts. Of course, digitized primary (archival sources, documents) or secondary sources (e.g. articles in academic databases) found in digital collection are permitted and an online source or two in addition to your other sources beyond the minimum is fine if chosen carefully for quality.

The process described above of “scraping” footnotes and bibliographies is a stage which requires only rapid skimming and brisk movement across a large number of candidate materials. This might be combined with a closer reading of a good general work. Once you have a good body of secondary sources, you can return to works previously skimmed and read in a more informed targeted way. In researching for an essay you rarely have to read an entire work, and even when you do so, you should skim less relevant sections. Unlike reading for pleasure, historical research involves reading as a hunt for answers to problems. If you find that your argument does not hold or has insufficient evidence to support it, zoom out again and restart the process. This circular movement is one very effective approach to historical research. Start broad, find potential key arguments and inspiring ideas. Moving quickly, test these ideas and arguments by searching in other sources and zooming into detailed cases and examples. If this doesn’t work or is insufficient, zoom out again and repeat. Once you are happy with an argument and the available evidence, then read more slowly and with determination, taking more detailed notes, and outlining your essay as you go.

The Worst Possible Way to Proceed: Perhaps the worst possible way to do research for your essay is to find a dozen or two works on your broad topic by title search. This usually results in you finding several very general and introductory works on your topic. Allow this collection of books and articles to rest comfortably on your shelf until the deadline nears, and then sit down and attempt to read all these works and hope that your essay will emerge from the vast knowledge you have gained in reading these books.

Essay Outline

Anytime between Week 8-11 you should submit an outline of your essay which includes an overview of how you are thinking of structuring your essay. This should also include a tentative essay title, the argument (updated from your prospectus), and hierarchical bullet points that follow the structure of your essay. You can do this down to the level of paragraphs, but don’t include whole paragraphs of text in the outline, just generalized overviews. At the bottom you may include a list of 2-3 questions that you are concerned about or problems you would like advice on. Then book an office hour and come and discuss your outline with me. Make sure you have emailed a copy of your outline to Konrad at least a full 24 hours or more before you meet Konrad in office hours.

How your Long Essay is Evaluated

The points that follow should be fairly clear from the questions posed above but are restated from the perspective of the marker of a very strong long essay:

Feedback

Feedback is generally provided directly on the mark sheet, which will be posted to the MMS within two weeks. Presentation feedback is provided at two points in the semester so they may be marked in groups. Some formative feedback on Moodle posts (before they are submitted to MMS) will be made sporadically throughout the semester, especially on the first or second post made by a student.

Policies

Marking

Within the School of History all work is assessed on a scale of 1-20 with intervals of 0.5. Module outcomes are reported using the same scale but with intervals of 0.1. The assessment criteria set out below are not comprehensive, but are intended to provide guidance in interpreting grades and improving the quality of assessed work. Students should bear in mind that presentation is an important element of assessment and that failure to adhere to the guidelines set out in the School of History Style Sheet will be penalised.

The marking scale can be found here:

https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/history/students/ug/assessment/

Extensions

Prior permissions for late submission of work (“Extensions”) to make fair allowance for adverse circumstances affecting a student’s ability to submit the work on time will be considered on a case by case basis. Normally such permissions will only be granted for circumstances that are both unforeseen and beyond the student’s control.

Word Limits and Late Work

It is important to work consistently through the semester and work around your other commitments and deadlines. Plan ahead and don’t save your work until the last minute. Assessed work with word limits should be always submitted within those limits. Writing in a clear and concise manner, and being able to structure and execute an argument that may be shorter than you feel is required is a skill that is of great use in academic fields as well as the workplace beyond. Please do not go over the limit and force yourself to work within them as a practice that will be important for writing assignments in your future careers.

The official School of Histories penalties for late work and short/long work are followed in this module:

https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/history/students/ug/assessment/

Please Note: In this module you will not be penalised for a long essay that goes over the requested word range but is up to 5,000 words. This exception applies only to the long essay.

Absence from Classes

Please see this page for more on our attendance policy:

https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/history/students/ug/attendance/

Emails

If you have a question that requires an answer with significant detail, please consider asking during office hours, or at the beginning or end of class. Please try to avoid sending emails that require more than a very brief answer. If the email requires a substantive answer, I may ask you to bring the question up again after our next class or in office hours. I will strive to offer a reply to emails received within 48 hours, whenever possible. Emails are usually not responded to over the weekend and may not even be read until Monday. In writing emails, please try to be clear about what you are asking, and keep in mind that your message is one among many from students of multiple classes and differing contexts. Please mention which course you are in and what specific matter you are referring to. As in class, feel free to address me by first name in emails. Finally, before hitting the send button, please confirm that the answer to your question is not found in the handbook, on official school websites, or other handouts provided to the class.

Laptops in Class

Recent studies are increasingly showing that, for whatever reasons, the handwriting of notes, and the reading of essays on physical paper as opposed to computers or other reading devices increases the quality of notes, significantly boosts recall, and better processing of content in general.

There are, however, many benefits to using a laptop for notes, and keeping reading content in digital form, not the least ready access, easy distribution, ability to re-sort notes, searchability, and for those who have handwriting as poor as mine: simple readability.

You are welcome to bring a laptop to class and use it for notes and reading. Please do not to use applications on your laptop not related to our class, including email applications and social media. Obviously they will interfere with your own concentration but that is not the primary concern: using other applications on your laptop is a severe distraction to anyone sitting next to you.

There will a number of occasions during the seminar when full undivided attention is required by students. Group work not related to sources, student presentations, and some other moments will not require any note-taking or referring to documents on your computer. In those occasions I may ask students to close laptops or turn over tablets so they can concentrate on the task at hand.

Academic Misconduct and Plagiarism

Academic integrity is fundamental to the values promoted by the University. It is important that all students are judged on their ability, and that no student is allowed unfairly to take an advantage over others, to affect the security and integrity of the assessment process, or to diminish the reliability and quality of a St Andrews degree. For more information on university policies see:

https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/students/rules/academicpractice/

I have a separate document where I outline the ways in which LLMs (generative AI) may be used in the course of your research and writing in ways that will not constitute academic misconduct. This will be distributed separately.

If you are unsure about the correct presentation of academic material, you should approach your tutor. You can also contact CEED, which provides an extensive range of training on Academic Skills.

https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/ceed/

Equality, Diversity and Inclusion

The School of History is committed to supporting equality of opportunity and inclusion at every level, irrespective of age, gender, maternity, disability, race, faith, sex and sexual orientation, through the enactment of fair policies and practices. The School seeks to provide a place of welcome, tolerance and inclusivity in which to study, work and research. For more information, please visit the Equality, Diversity and Inclusion section of the School’s website, on

https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/history/about/equality-diversity-inclusion/

Reading

Weekly average pages of required reading: 200-250

This honours module is by no means an easy one. The fact that the module is on East Asian history, an area which students may have very little familiarity with, but not a sub-honours survey module, means that students should be prepared to take the initiative to read around the assigned materials and delve into the further reading in order to get a better understanding of the material.

A work load of fifteen to eighteen hours a week (some weeks you may need a few more, some weeks less) outside of seminar is expected. Of this, you should expect your weekly preparation for class in terms of reading to be 7-12 hours in all weeks except the consolidation week and pair writing week, together with 5-8 hours of work on your assignments and research, especially for the long essay. I urge you to spread the load of your work on assignments across the weeks, to prevent stress towards the end of the semester.

Your weekly reading will usually consist of 200-250 pages of required reading. Thus, working on an estimate of 250 pages a week total is a safe bet, or, at roughly 30 pages an hour (taking some limited notes), about 8-9 hours, but most likely longer if you take more notes. To this must be added time for your research and assessments.

It is not wise to do your reading in a single sitting, as your concentration will fade, so I suggest you split the readings into two or three, and read them across several days. Give yourself more time for the primary sources vs the secondary sources relative to their length to allow you to pay especially close attention to language and detail in the former. I would recommend that you try to “timebox” the readings, giving yourself a fixed period of time for any given reading and, if it looks unlikely that you will have time to read something carefully, skim it with general notes on the main arguments, events, and issues, as necessary. This is especially useful in weeks when you need to limit your reading preparation time in order to work more on your research for the long essay.

Seminars

Please Note: We have an online reading list for the module for your convenience but it is harder to read, is sometimes missing texts, and does not include specific tasks that I set for your preparation. Always work from the handbook as you prepare your readings but you can check for ebook versions etc. with the digital reading list. Again: this handbook is the canonical version of your preparation guidelines, not the sometimes incorrect online reading list.

Abbreviations for readings:

F = optional further reading
P = Text is a candidate for presentations

Week 1 - Introduction to Buddhism

Preparation

Required Reading

Elective Reading

Each week you will be required to do additional reading but have a choice from a selection. We will try to maximise coverage of elective reading from week to week but may not get to every category in class discussion. I would like to ask that we try to have at least one person per category each week. The elective reading is what you do your elective reading handouts on.

Choose one of these categories: A (Pure Land) OR B (Nichiren) OR C (Ch’an/Zen) and read only the material labelled with your category from each text.

Further Reading

You are not required to do any particular further reading on any given week. However, this section in each week will be useful for you as you think about the topic for your long essay and provide you with additional sources that can serve as the starting place for your research.

General

Primary Sources

Buddhism in Korea

Other Secondary Sources

Reference

Week 2 - Introduction to Confucianism

Preparation

Required Reading (~90)

These readings will give you some basic exposure to the Analects, and Mengzi

Bonus Challenge

Try this text adventure game, with translation exercise “The Hall of Sages,” that I created for my nephew as a Christmas puzzle: http://huginn.net/projects/hall-of-sages/.

Elective Reading

Choose one of the categories below for your elective reading. Remember to bring a handout with an overview of the readings in your category and that you may be asked to speak about these readings in class.

A) Gender and Confucianism

Further Reading

B) Confucianism in Korea

Further Reading

C) Confucianism in Japan

Further Reading

D) Neo-Confucianism

Further Reading

E) Xunzi

Reference

General Further Reading

Week 3 - Taiping and Tonghak

Preparation

Required Reading (~115)

Elective Reading

Read one of the following categories:

  1. Reilly, Thomas H. The Taiping Heavenly Kingdom: Rebellion and the Blasphemy of Empire. University of Washington Press, 2011. Ch 2-4 (P) Ebook

  2. Young, Carl F. Eastern Learning and the Heavenly Way: The Tonghak and Ch’ŏndogyo Movements and the Twilight of Korean Independence. University of Hawaiʻi Press, 2014. Ch 1-3 (P) Ebook

  3. Kilcourse, Carl S. Taiping Theology: The Localization of Christianity in China, 1843–64. Springer, 2016. Ch 1 “Introduction”, Ch 3 “The Taiping Mission of World Salvation” Ch 5 “A Confucianized Christian Ethic” Ebook

  4. Kallander, George L. Salvation Through Dissent: Tonghak Heterodoxy and Early Modern Korea. University of Hawaiʻi Press, 2013. Introduction, Ch 2-3. (P) Ebook

  5. Anderson, Emily. Belief and Practice in Imperial Japan and Colonial Korea. Springer, 2016 Ebook Ch 5 “Eastern Learning Divided: The Split in the Tonghak Religion and the Japanese Annexation of Korea, 1904–1910” + Moon, Yumi. ‘Immoral Rights: Korean Populist Collaborators and the Japanese Colonization of Korea, 1904–1910’. The American Historical Review 118, no. 1 (2 January 2013): 20–44. Jstor

Essays on Taiping Rebellion

If you are interested in working on the Taiping Rebellion see me for a copy of the excellent primary sources available in The Taiping Rebellion: History and Documents. For essays on this topic there are also many interesting Western missionary and other English language sources that may be of interest.

Further Reading: Boxer Rebellion

General Further Reading

Week 4 - Revolutionary Internationalism

Preparation

Required Reading (~85)

Elective Reading

A) Shifu

B) Development of Chinese Anarchism

C) Anarchist Cooperatism

D) Kōtoku Shūsui

E) Uchiyama Gudō

F) Ōsugi Sakae

G) Taixu

General Further Reading

Week 5 - New Orders for Love, Family, and the Liberation of Women

Preparation

Required Reading (~110)

Elective Reading

A) Debates on Family and Love in China

B) More on He Zhen

C) Qiu Jin

D) Tang Qunying

E) Revolution of the Heart

F) Shifting Interpretations

G) In the Event of Women

H) Dangerous Women

I) LGBTQ History

General Further Reading

Week 6 - Independent Learning Week

Week 7 - Buddhist World Orders

Preparation

Required Reading (~70)

Elective Reading

A) Pure Land

B) Zen

C) Nichiren

D) Korean Buddhism

E) Ishiwara Kanji

F) Buddhism and Empire

G) Buddhism to the West

H) Buddhism in Japanese Manchuria

I) Building the Buddhist Revival

General Further Reading

Week 8 - Cosmopolitanism from the East

Preparation

Required Reading (~80)

Elective Reading

A) Kang Youwei

B) Deguchi Onisaburō

C) Imperial Internationalism

D) Esperanto

E) Li Yujie and Zhang Tianran

General Further Reading

Week 9 - New Directions in Japanese Thought and Overcoming Modernity

Preparation

Required Reading (~110)

Elective Reading

A) Overcoming Modernity - Kindai no Chōkoku

B) Nishida Kitarō

C) Tanabe Hajime

D) Watsuji Tetsurō

E) Nishitani Keiji

F) Takeuchi Yoshimi

G) Tosaka Jun

H) Miki Kiyoshi

I) Kuki Shūzō

General Further Reading

Week 10 - Confucian Renewals

Preparation

Required Reading (~100)

Elective Reading

A) Chinese Confucianism and Fascism

B) Early Pioneers: Xiong Shili, Liang Shuming, Feng Youlan

C) Mou Zongsan

D) Qing Jiang

E) “Boston Confucians”

F) Ci Jiwei on China’s Moral Crisis

General Further Reading

Week 11 - Imagining Alternate Futures

Preparation

Required Reading

Elective Reading

A) Kagawa Toyohiko

B) Kita Ikki

C) Japanese Utopian Literature and Science Fiction

D) Chinese Utopian Literature and Science Fiction

General Further Reading

Other Relevant Topics For Research Essay

Shinto

Daoism

Christianity in East Asia

Shamanism in Korea

History of Sexuality in East Asia

Acknowledgements

Primary Sources on East and Southeast Asia

Below are a selection of potential starting points for primary sources relevant for historical research on East and Southeast Asia. Many of these are available through our library electronic resources. Others you can contact me about if you are having trouble finding them. Not all of these sources are in English and I have included some sources here for use by students who are able to read Chinese, Japanese, and Korean.

SCONUL: St Andrews students may get a SCONUL card which allows them to access libraries elsewhere in Scotland, including the University of Edinburgh, which has a very extensive East Asia collection of books and resources.

Frog in a Well Primary Source Guides

See these guides on Frog in a Well for many useful resources:

Newspapers and Periodicals:

Government Documents

Missionary Reports and Publications

Memoirs, Diaries, Digitised Books etc.

Propaganda, Posters, and Pamphlets

Photographs, Postcards, Films

Recordings and Sound

Maps and GIS

Other

Japan

Korea

Taiwan

China

Hong Kong

Southeast Asia

See Me

Some Key Secondary Source Databases