/blog/2006/08/dagbladet-and-wikipedia/ But I fear more for Muninn... Thu, 16 May 2013 14:30:52 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.2 /blog/2006/08/dagbladet-and-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-15257 Wed, 16 Aug 2006 12:53:10 +0000 http://muninn.net/blog/2006/08/dagbladet-and-wikipedia.html#comment-15257 I suppose the best-case scenario is that they got the information from Wikipedia, confirmed it elsewhere, but left Wikipedia as the source for the same reason that you list secondary sources in a bibliography, if that’s where you found the primary source text you quote… doesn’t seem likely, though.

]]> /blog/2006/08/dagbladet-and-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-15249 Wed, 16 Aug 2006 04:27:56 +0000 http://muninn.net/blog/2006/08/dagbladet-and-wikipedia.html#comment-15249 I think you’ve summed it up very nicely. Wikipedia is great for casual or preliminary research but should never be a definitive source.

]]>